20 May 2010
The nutritional benefits of organic food have been called into question by new research which shows wild garden birds prefer conventional seed to that which has been organically-grown.
A three-year study by Newcastle University has found that wild birds are not swayed by the organic label, but instead prefer the more protein-rich, conventional food that will help them to survive the winter.
Published today in the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, lead researcher Dr Ailsa McKenzie said the findings were likely to be of 'considerable interest to the general public in the debate over the relative merits of consuming organic food.'
'Our results suggest that the current dogma that organic food is preferred to conventional food may not always be true,' explains Dr McKenzie, based in the School of Biology at Newcastle University. 'Protein is an essential nutrient in the diet of all birds and mammals and getting enough of it – especially in winter – can be hard.
'We showed that when given free choice, wild birds opt for the conventional food over the organic, and the most likely explanation is its higher protein content.
'This study is only looking at one aspect of the organic food debate – it does not take into account the long-term health implications of using chemical fertilizers and pesticides, or the often negative environmental impact of conventional farming; for example, other work has shown that pesticides can strongly reduce availability of seeds for birds.
'But it does raise questions about the nutritional benefits of organic food and what consumers are being led to believe.'
Global demand for organic produce is increasing by £4billion annually – the organic market now accounts for between two and three per cent of all food purchased in Europe and the USA. One key reason why consumers buy organic food is because they consider it to be better for human and animal health. While this may indeed be the case, these are not necessarily the only factors governing food choice in animals and birds.
To carry out the study the Newcastle team set up feeding stations in more than 30 gardens across the North of England. Organic and non-organic wheat seeds (both of the same variety) were placed in adjacent bird feeders and then the rate at which the birds ate the different seeds was monitored over a six week period.
Half way through the experiment the feeders were swapped around. The experiment was repeated in a second winter with different wheat samples.
The birds showed a strong preference for the conventional seed, eating significantly more of this than the organic. When the feeder positions were switched, the birds learned the new position of the conventional seed and continued to select it in preference to the organic. Analysis of the wheat found the conventionally-grown seeds to have an average 10 per cent higher protein content than the organic seeds. Other differences between the samples (eg in mycotoxin levels, grain size, energy content or pesticide residues) could not explain the preferences shown by the birds.
The garden bird work was confirmed by laboratory studies on canaries, also showing a significant preference for conventionally - over organically - grown seeds. Dr McKenzie explained: 'Conventionally-grown crops tend to contain significantly higher levels of protein than those grown organically due to the application of inorganic nitrogen fertilizers in conventional farming systems.
'This makes our findings potentially applicable across many food types and suggests the issues surrounding organic food are not as cut and dried as some might think.' To watch a short video about this study, please click here.
This study is published in the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. Media wishing to receive a PDF of this article may contact email@example.com.
Full Citation: 'Birds select conventional over organic wheat when given free choice' Ailsa McKenzie and Mark Whittingham. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture; 2010 DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4025
To arrange an interview with the authors please contact Louella Houldcroft, Newcastle University, tel: +44 (0) 191 222 5108/7850 or +44 07989 850511 or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, mini-reviews, perspectives and spotlights in these areas, with particular emphasis on interdisciplinary studies at the agriculture/ food interface. This international journal covers fundamental and applied research, including: food, health and nutrition, food science and technology, biotechnology, molecular biology, biochemistry, food safety, materials and processing, agriculture production, utilisation, and environment, as well as sensory and consumer sciences. The Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture is published by Wiley on behalf of SCI.
SCI, the society where science meets business on independent, impartial ground is a unique international forum which anyone can join where they can share and exchange information, ideas, new innovations and research and access SCI’s growing database of member specialists between sectors as diverse as food and agriculture, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, environmental science and safety. Originally established in 1881, SCI is a registered charity with members in over 90 countries. For more information on SCI activities and publications, click here.